BOOK INDEX
At the core of the issue
What risks can you be willing to take?
The Golan Heights
Judea and Samaria
Peace for Peace
When is Peace More Likely?
Do the Arabs Really Want Peace?
Why Let Terror and peace Go Hand and Hand?
Why Won't We Say What the Emperor is [Not] Wearing?
Our Right to the Land of Israel
Practically What To Do Now
What America Wants
Projecting an Image
Concern that Leaps Over Geographic Boundaries
Part 2
The Six-Day War and its Aftermath
The War of Attrition
The Yom Kippur War
Courage and Fortitude, But Whose? - The Camp David Accords
Lebanon
Autonomy and Intifada
The Gulf War
What the Future Has in Store
What risks can you be willing to take?
It is hard not to become caught up with the immediacy of an issue. Especially when one is concerned with a subject like peace, there is a natural desire to hastily seek an agreement as soon as possible. Nevertheless, this feeling of immediacy should never be allowed to obscure the priorities involved. If the peace is to last longer than the time it took to hammer out the agreement, we must make sure that it realistically answers the objectives that we seek.
What does Israel want out of peace? Two fundamental objectives:
- that it be secure against attack from the surrounding Arab nations;
- that its citizens may rest assured that their lives will not be endangered by terrorist attack.
These objectives are primarily military issues. Therefore it is military experts who should be consulted for the parameters according to which any negotiations should be conducted.
To refer to a parallel: When there is a question of whether the Sabbath laws must be violated to save the life of a patient, the Torah prescribes that one ask an expert - a doctor; more specifically, a doctor in the relevant field. For a heart condition one consults a cardiologist, not a dermatologist.
To return to the analog: There are many dimensions to the Israeli-Arab conflict. Nevertheless, just as when a person has a heart condition, it is the cardiologist whose opinion is given highest priority, since Israel's fundamental concerns are questions of security, it is the opinions of military men and particularly, those trained in the issues at hand, that must determine the guidelines - and the red lines - for negotiations.
When military experts are asked, they explain that it is absolutely necessary for Israel to maintain possession of the lands taken in the Six-Day War. The reasons for this stance are plainly obvious.
The Golan Heights command control of the entire Galilee, Israel's north. Missiles and artillery placed in the Golan could easily destroy civilian centers and military bases in the Galilee. Moreover, even in our age of hi-tech weaponry, fighting uphill is much more difficult than fighting downhill or fighting on level terrain. Thus, if Syrian troops would attack from the Golan, Israel would be put in a defensive position that would be very challenging to turn around.