BOOK INDEX
At the core of the issue
What risks can you be willing to take?
The Golan Heights
Judea and Samaria
Peace for Peace
When is Peace More Likely?
Do the Arabs Really Want Peace?
Why Let Terror and peace Go Hand and Hand?
Why Won't We Say What the Emperor is [Not] Wearing?
Our Right to the Land of Israel
Practically What To Do Now
What America Wants
Projecting an Image
Concern that Leaps Over Geographic Boundaries
Part 2
The Six-Day War and its Aftermath
The War of Attrition
The Yom Kippur War
Courage and Fortitude, But Whose? - The Camp David Accords
Lebanon
Autonomy and Intifada
The Gulf War
What the Future Has in Store
Why Won't We Say What the Emperoris [Not] Wearing?
Why won't the Israelis face the facts and speak about them openly? Why won't they acknowledge that from the beginning until the present all the peace process has accomplished is to strengthen the Arab position?
There are two reasons. First of all, it would jeopardize their own credibility. They risked entering into negotiations and/or agreements with the Arabs, and they feel that admitting that the Arabs have not relented, would be considered a failure. If they would say: "Look, the emperor is naked; there are no new clothes; the Arabs have not made any moves toward peace," they fear that their own garments would also look pretty shabby. They would have to admit that they had endangered the security of their land with a mistaken approach.
So what is done instead? They ignore the danger and try to camouflage it so that others will not see it as well. There were times when terrorist attacks were reported in Western news media before the official media in Israel even mentioned them. On numerous occasions, rather than expose the charade in the Arab peace effort, Israel has reinforced the Arab position by publicly recognizing them as "partners in the endeavor to reach peace."
But the Israeli difficulty with speaking honestly about the peace process goes deeper than the self-interest of the leaders who have embraced it. Israel has continually chosen to worry first about what other nations will say, and second about its own priorities. Rather than focus on what is necessary for our own security, growth and development, the attitude has always been: What will the Arabs say? And what will the response from Washington be?
Not that there is anything novel in this attitude. Over three thousand years ago, the returning scouts whom Moses had dispatched to report on the inhabitants of the Promised Land debriefed as follows: "We were like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and so we were in theirs." It all begins with our own self-image, how we look at ourselves. When we perceive ourselves as puny, when we cower within, it is no surprise that our enemies will act aggressively toward us. Conversely, when we have self-respect, when without boastful pride we focus on our own priorities and give precedence to our own security, other nations will regard us differently.
After the Six-Day War there was a real fear of Israel and her army within the Arab world. Today, sadly, that is no longer true. Why? Because of our concessions, because of our inability to stand up and claim what is rightfully ours, they perceive us as weak. And a weak enemy invites aggressiveness.
The same applies with regard to Israel's relations with America. If Israel will not stand up for her priorities, can one expect America to fight for them? If Israel will not protest the constant Arab violation of agreements, why should America be concerned with them?
Even when we need help from other nations, we need not cower before them in fear. America considers foreign aid as an investment. And every investor will be more impressed with a prospective partner who - though not boastful or arrogant - knows what he needs and wants and is forthright in seeking it.